ERNAY et al v. SWATSKI et al
Filing
21
ORDER THAT DEFT SWATSKI'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 8/9/11. 8/10/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
_______________________________________
ADRANIH ERNAY, ADRIAN ERNAY,
WENDELL WESLEY, OTIS RAGLAND, and
LINDA FAUST,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CHRIS SWATSKI,
Defendant.
_______________________________________
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 10-1035
ORDER
AND NOW, this 9th day of August 2011, upon consideration of Defendant Swatski’s
Motion for Reconsideration (Document No. 19, filed July 28, 2011), for the reasons set forth in
the Memorandum dated August 9, 2011, Defendant Swatski’s Motion for Reconsideration is
GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as follows:
1.
The motion is GRANTED with respect to defendant’s request that the Court rule
on his claim of qualified immunity based on his belief that a parole absconder was at plaintiffs’
property the day that he and other agents under his supervision searched plaintiffs’ apartments.
The Court RULES that defendant is not entitled to qualified immunity on this ground; and
2.
Defendant’s motion is DENIED in all other respects.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Hon. Jan E. DuBois
JAN E. DUBOIS, J.
_
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?