SOUTHCO, INC. v. FIVETECH TECHNOLOGY INC.

Filing 195

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT FIVETECH TECHNOLOGY, INC.'S MOTION TO STRIKE IS DENIED. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANT AND AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF ON THESE CLAIMS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 3/23/12. 3/23/12 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(fdc)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
SOUTHCO, INC.
v.
FIVETECH TECHNOLOGY INC.

:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 10-1060

ORDER
AND NOW, this 23rd day of March, 2012, for the reasons
stated in a memorandum of law bearing today’s date, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED THAT:
1.

Upon consideration of the defendant’s Objections

and Motion to Strike Exhibits N and O From the Declaration of
Antranig Baronian, the Declaration of Paul Soldo, and Portions of
the Declaration of John D. Pratt, Ph.D., P.E. in Support of
Southco, Inc.’s Opposition to Fivetech Technology Inc.’s Motion
(Docket No. 159), the opposition and reply thereto, and following
oral argument on February 28, 2012, this motion is DENIED.
2.

Upon consideration of the defendant’s Motion for

Partial Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of Claims 16 and 17
of U.S. Patent No. 5,851,095 (Docket No. 141), the opposition and
reply thereto, and following oral argument held on February 28,

2012, this motion is GRANTED.

Judgment is hereby ENTERED in

favor of the above-named defendant and against the plaintiff on
these claims.

BY THE COURT:
/s/ Mary A. McLaughlin
MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, J.

-2-