LONG et al v. BRISTOL TOWNSHIP et al
Filing
66
ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 8/14/2012. 8/14/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ROBERT C. LONG, SR. &
JANET V. LONG,
Plaintiffs,
v.
BRISTOL TOWNSHIP, et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 10-1069
ORDER
AND NOW, this 14th day of August, 2012, upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion to
Amend Complaint (Docket No. 63), and Defendants’ Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion
to Amend Complaint (Docket No. 64), it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion is DENIED.
It is so ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
S/ RONALD L. BUCKWALTER
RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S.J.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
