RAMAGE v. RESCOT SYSTEMS GROUP INC. et al

Filing 30

ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET NO. 16) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS SET FORTH IN THE ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 12/6/11. 12/6/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA EVELYN RAMAGE, Plaintiff, : : : v. : : RESCOT SYSTEMS GROUP, INC., et al., : Defendants. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1120 ORDER AND NOW, this 6th day of December 2011, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 16), and all responses thereto, for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum dated December 6, 2011, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. The Motion is GRANTED with respect to all claims alleging actual or perceived disability discrimination under the ADA or PHRA. 2. The Motion is GRANTED with respect to all claims alleging hostile work environment under the ADA or PHRA. 3. The Motion is GRANTED with respect to all claims alleging interference under the FMLA. 4. The Motion is DENIED with respect to all claims alleging retaliation under the ADA, PHRA, or FMLA. BY THE COURT: S/Gene E.K. Pratter GENE E.K. PRATTER United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?