RAMAGE v. RESCOT SYSTEMS GROUP INC. et al
ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET NO. 16) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS SET FORTH IN THE ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 12/6/11. 12/6/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RESCOT SYSTEMS GROUP, INC., et al., :
AND NOW, this 6th day of December 2011, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion
for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 16), and all responses thereto, for the reasons set forth in the
Memorandum dated December 6, 2011, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion is
GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:
The Motion is GRANTED with respect to all claims alleging actual or perceived
disability discrimination under the ADA or PHRA.
The Motion is GRANTED with respect to all claims alleging hostile work
environment under the ADA or PHRA.
The Motion is GRANTED with respect to all claims alleging interference under
The Motion is DENIED with respect to all claims alleging retaliation under the
ADA, PHRA, or FMLA.
BY THE COURT:
S/Gene E.K. Pratter
GENE E.K. PRATTER
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?