KNISELY et al. v. SHRED - IT USA, INC. et al.

Filing 46

ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY IS GRANTED. THE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SURREPLY IS GRANTED. CINTAS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM. BY NOON ON 3/21/2014 THE PARTIES SHALL JOINTLY INFORM THE COURT WHETHER SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS WITH MAGISTRATE JUDGE HART WOULD LIKELY BE PRODUCTIVE. FURTHER SCHEDULING SHALL ABIDE THE COURT'S RECEIPT OF THAT SUBMISSION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE STEWART DALZELL ON 3/14/2014. 3/14/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ex rel. DOUGLAS KNISELY et al.
v.
CINTAS CORPORATION, INC.

:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 10-1193

ORDER
AND NOW, this 14th day of March, 2014, upon consideration of defendant
Cintas Corporation Inc.’s motion to dismiss (docket entry # 37), plaintiff Douglas Knisely’s
response in opposition thereto, Cintas’s motion for leave to file a reply to that response (docket
entry # 43), and Knisely’s motion for leave to file a surreply (docket entry # 44), and for the
reasons articulated in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.

The motion for leave to file a reply (docket entry # 43) is GRANTED;

2.

The motion for leave to file a surreply (docket entry # 44) is GRANTED;

3.

Cintas’s motion to dismiss (docket entry # 37) is GRANTED IN PART

and DENIED IN PART in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum;
4.

By noon on March 21, 2014, the parties shall jointly INFORM the Court

by facsimile (215-580-2156) whether settlement discussions with Magistrate Judge Hart would
likely be productive; and
5.

Further scheduling shall ABIDE the Court’s receipt of that submission.
BY THE COURT:

_/S/ STEWART DALZELL, J.
Stewart Dalzell, J.