SPEAKMAN v. ASTRUE
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPRED; PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IS GRANTED INSOFAR AS PLAINTIFF REQUESTS A REMAND; THE MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR ALL PURPOSES, INCLUDING STATISTICS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 4/27/2011. 4/29/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
AMANDA K. SPEAKMAN,
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
AND NOW, this 27th day of April 2011, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for
Summary Judgment, or in the alternative, Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand (Doc. No. 8) and
Defendant’s Response to the Request for Review (Doc. No. 9), and after careful review of the
Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge L. Felipe Restrepo (Doc. No.
11), to which no objections were filed, it is ORDERED that:
The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED insofar as plaintiff requests a remand;
The matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to
sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the
Report and Recommendation; and
The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for all purposes, including
BY THE COURT:
S/Gene E.K. Pratter
GENE E. K. PRATTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?