WHITE v. ASTRUE

Filing 18

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. #16) ARE OVERRULED. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #6) IS DENIED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 5/3/2012; 5/3/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(tomg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ERNEST WHITE v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1233 ORDER AND NOW, this 3rd day of May, 2012, upon consideration of the pleadings and record herein, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey and Plaintiff’s objections thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 16) are OVERRULED; 2. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED1; 3. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 6) is DENIED; 4. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and against Plaintiff. BY THE COURT: /s/ John R. Padova ______________________ John R. Padova, J. 1 Plaintiff’s objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation present no new issues and arguments. The issues and arguments that have been set forth by such objections have been correctly and adequately addressed by the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation which is now approved and adopted.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?