FIOCCA v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al

Filing 20

ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THE MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO COUNT I, WHICH IS DISMISSED, AND DENIED AS TO COUNT II. THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND PLAINTIFFS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DENIED. THE DEFENDANT SHALL FILE AN ANSWER TO THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN 20 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN P. FULLAM ON 3/28/2011. 3/28/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )

Download PDF
FIOCCA v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al Doc. 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MICHAEL FIOCCA v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA : : : : : O R D E R AND NOW, this 28th day of March 2011, upon consideration of the pending motions and the responses thereto, IT IS ORDERED: 1. That the defendant's Motion to Dismiss the CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1289 plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Motion is GRANTED as to Count I, which is dismissed, and DENIED as to Count II. 2. That the plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint is DENIED. 3. That the defendant shall file an answer to the Second Amended Complaint within 20 days of the date of this Order. BY THE COURT: /s/ John P. Fullam John P. Fullam, Sr. J. Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?