MORALES v. PNC BANK NA

Filing 44

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT ON THE ENTIRETY OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT AGAINST IT. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFF DENYSE MORALES'S DECLARATION IS DENIED AS MOOT. THIS CASE IS NOW CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 10/3/2012. 10/4/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DENYSE H. MORALES, Plaintiff, v. PNC BANK, N.A., Defendant. : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1368 ORDER AND NOW, this 3rd day of October, 2012, upon consideration of (1) Defendant PNC Bank’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Counts I, III, IV, and V of the Amended Complaint (Docket No. 29) and the Response of Plaintiff Denyse Morales (Docket No. 35), and (2) Defendant’s Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff Denyse Morales’s Declaration (Docket No. 39) and the Brief in Opposition by Plaintiff Denyse Morales (Docket No. 40), is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 2. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of Defendant on the entirety of the Amended Complaint against it. 3. Defendant’s Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff Denyse Morales’s Declaration is DENIED as moot. 4. This case is now closed. It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT: s/ Ronald L. Buckwalter RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?