KARPF v. MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
Filing
109
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS AMENDED MOTION IN LIMINE (DOC. 98) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 2/5/19. 2/6/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DOUGLAS K. KARPF
CIVIL ACTION
v.
NO. 10-1401
MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL.
ORDER
AND NOW, this
,f{_xy
of February , 2019, upon consideration of Defendant's
Amended Motion in Limine (ECF No. 98), and all documents submitted in support thereof and
in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED
IN PART as follows:
1.
The Motion is GRANTED IN PART insofar as Plaintiff will be precluded from
offering factual or lay opinion testimony that is not based on personal or first-hand knowledge or
other proper evidentiary foundation.
2.
The Motion is GRANTED insofar as Plaintiff will be precluded from offering
evidence that MassMutual interfered with Plaintiffs prospective contractual relations.
3.
The Motion is GRANTED IN PART insofar as Plaintiffs damages expert's
report and testimony will not be admitted unless and until there is sufficient evidence in the trial
record to provide a factual basis for the expert's damages analysis and its underlying
assumptions.
4.
The Motion is GRANTED insofar as Plaintiff will be precluded from offering
evidence concerning unpaid first-year commissions.
5.
The Motion is GRANTED insofar as Plaintiff will be precluded from presenting
evidence concerning an "eggshell skull" theory of alleged emotional distress damages.
6.
The Motion is GRANTED insofar as Plaintiff will be precluded from offering
evidence of hearsay statements made by Plaintiffs clients concerning Plaintiffs role with "the
company."
7.
In all other respects the Motion is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
((ii
R. B
2
i
~
__/;
CL
SURRICi J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?