KARPF v. MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al

Filing 109

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS AMENDED MOTION IN LIMINE (DOC. 98) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 2/5/19. 2/6/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DOUGLAS K. KARPF CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 10-1401 MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. ORDER AND NOW, this ,f{_xy of February , 2019, upon consideration of Defendant's Amended Motion in Limine (ECF No. 98), and all documents submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. The Motion is GRANTED IN PART insofar as Plaintiff will be precluded from offering factual or lay opinion testimony that is not based on personal or first-hand knowledge or other proper evidentiary foundation. 2. The Motion is GRANTED insofar as Plaintiff will be precluded from offering evidence that MassMutual interfered with Plaintiffs prospective contractual relations. 3. The Motion is GRANTED IN PART insofar as Plaintiffs damages expert's report and testimony will not be admitted unless and until there is sufficient evidence in the trial record to provide a factual basis for the expert's damages analysis and its underlying assumptions. 4. The Motion is GRANTED insofar as Plaintiff will be precluded from offering evidence concerning unpaid first-year commissions. 5. The Motion is GRANTED insofar as Plaintiff will be precluded from presenting evidence concerning an "eggshell skull" theory of alleged emotional distress damages. 6. The Motion is GRANTED insofar as Plaintiff will be precluded from offering evidence of hearsay statements made by Plaintiffs clients concerning Plaintiffs role with "the company." 7. In all other respects the Motion is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. BY THE COURT: ((ii R. B 2 i ~ __/; CL SURRICi J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?