ROGERS v. CONAIR CORPORATION

Filing 103

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS IS GRANTED AND PLAINTIFF'S CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE TO THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 4/24/12. 4/25/12 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLV ANI BRUCE ROGERS, Plaintiff CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1497 v. CONAIR CORP., Defendant ORDER AND NOW, on this 24th day of April 2012, upon review of Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Doc. No. 84], Plaintiff's Response [Doc. No. 86], Defendant's Reply [Doc. No. 90], and Plaintiff's Sur-Reply [Doc. No. 93], and upon review ofPlaintiff's Notice of Constitutional Challenge [Doc. No. 87], and the Government's response thereto [Doc. No. 98], and for the reasons set forth in the attached opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion is GRANTED and Plaintiff's Constitutional Challenge to the America Invents Act is DENIED. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint within twenty-one (21) days ofthe date of this Order. It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT: ENTERED APR littnt CLERKOFC(dIr

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?