FULLMAN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THE CASE AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 12/20/16. 12/20/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED..(mbh, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al.,
O R D E R
AND NOW, this 20th day of December, 2016, upon
consideration of the 2008 and 2011 depositions of Plaintiff Andrew
Fullman (ECF Nos. 70-3, 70-4), Plaintiff Andrew Fullman’s Third
Amended Complaint (ECF No. 77), Defendants’ Answer to the Third
Amended Complaint (ECF No. 79), Defendants’ Renewed Motion for Summary
Judgment (ECF No. 80), and Plaintiff Andrew Fullman’s response in
opposition thereto (ECF No. 81), and for the reasons stated in the
accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
Defendants’ Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF
No. 80) is GRANTED.
Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint (ECF No. 77) is
DISMISSED with prejudice.
The Clerk of Court is directed to mark the case as CLOSED.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Eduardo C. Robreno
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?