COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON LABEL-BASED CLAIMS (DOC. NO. 64) AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON RESTITUTION (DOC. NO. 68) ARE GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 12/7/2017. 12/8/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO LIAISON COUNSEL. (SEE PAPER # 5156 IN 07-MD-1871) (ems) **(FILED IN ERROR; DUPLICATE ENTRY)**Modified on 12/8/2017 (ems).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN RE: AVANDIA MARKETING, SALES :
PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS
THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO:
County of Santa Clara v. SmithKline
Beecham Corporation, doing business as
MDL NO. 1871
AND NOW, this 7th day of December 2017, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for
Partial Summary Judgment on Label-Based Claims [Doc. No. 64], Defendant’s Motion for Partial
Summary Judgment on Restitution [Doc. No. 68], the responses and replies thereto, arguments
made by counsel for the parties at the hearing held on February 3, 2017, and in accordance with the
Memorandum Opinion issued this day, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motions [Doc. Nos. 64, 68]
It is so ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Cynthia M. Rufe, J.
CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?