FUREY v. WOLFE et al

Filing 117

OPINION/ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. THIS CASE REMAINS REFERRED TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE HEY FOR FINAL DISPOSITION OF ALL PRETRIAL MATTERS NOT DISPOSITIVE OF A PARTY'S CLAIM OF DEFENSE. THE PARTIES SHALL CONTACT JUDGE HEY TO DISCUSS SCHEDULING THE REMAINDER OF THIS MATTER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 12/27/11. 12/27/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ky, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KEVIN FUREY
v.
TRAVIS WOLFE, et al.

:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 10-1820

ORDER
AND NOW, this 27th day of December, 2011, upon
consideration of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket
No. 104) and the responses and replies thereto, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED, for the reasons stated in a memorandum of law bearing
today’s date, that the defendants’ motion is DENIED.

This case

remains referred to Magistrate Judge Hey for final disposition of
all pretrial matters not dispostive of a party’s claim or
defense.

The parties shall contact Judge Hey to discussing

scheduling the remainder of this matter.

BY THE COURT:
/s/ Mary A. McLaughlin
MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, J.