AQUILINO v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY

Filing 20

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO EXPAND DISCOVERY BEYOND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD, DEFENDANT'S LETTER BRIEF IN OPPOSITION THERETO 16 , PLAINTIFF'S LETTER BRIEF IN RESPONSE 17 , AND DEFENDANT'S LETTER BRIEF IN REPLY 18 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY BEYOND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD IS DENIED. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY ON 8/31/10. 9/1/10 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA D IA N E AQUILINO v. H A R T F O R D LIFE AND ACCIDENT IN S U R A N C E COMPANY : : : : : : C IV IL ACTION N O . 10-2044 ORDER A N D NOW, this 31st day of August 2010, upon consideration of Plaintiff's re q u e s t to expand discovery beyond the Administrative Record, Defendant's letter brief in o p p o sitio n thereto (Doc. 16), Plaintiff's letter brief in response (Doc. 17), and D e f e n d a n t's letter brief in reply (Doc. 18), it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's re q u e s t for discovery beyond the Administrative Record is DENIED.5 B Y THE COURT: /s/ Elizabeth T. Hey ELIZABETH T. HEY U N IT E D STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE By separate Order, I will schedule a teleconference with counsel to schedule the re m a in d e r of this case. 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?