CSB-SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL INC. v. SAP AMERICA, INC.

Filing 135

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT IS GRANTED ON PLAINTIFF'S THEORY OF LITERAL INFRINGEMENT BUT DENIED AS TO PLAINTIFF'S THEORY OF INFRINGEMENT UNDER THE DOCTRINE OF EQUIVALENTS. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INFRINGEMENT IS DENIED IN ITS ENTIRETY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 4/17/12. 4/17/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CSB-SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL INC. Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, v. SAP AMERICA, INC., Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-2156 ORDER AND NOW, this 16th day of April, 2012, upon consideration of Defendant SAP America, Inc.’s (“SAP”) Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement (Docket No. 93), Plaintiff CSB-System International, Inc.’s (“CSB”) Response in Opposition and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement (Docket No. 107), Defendant’s Reply Brief (Docket No. 119), and Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (Docket No. 125), it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement is GRANTED on Plaintiff’s theory of literal infringement, but DENIED as to Plaintiff’s theory of infringement under the doctrine of equivalents; 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement is DENIED in its entirety. It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Ronald L. Buckwalter RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?