CSB-SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL INC. v. SAP AMERICA, INC.
Filing
135
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT IS GRANTED ON PLAINTIFF'S THEORY OF LITERAL INFRINGEMENT BUT DENIED AS TO PLAINTIFF'S THEORY OF INFRINGEMENT UNDER THE DOCTRINE OF EQUIVALENTS. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INFRINGEMENT IS DENIED IN ITS ENTIRETY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 4/17/12. 4/17/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CSB-SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL INC.
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant,
v.
SAP AMERICA, INC.,
Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 10-2156
ORDER
AND NOW, this 16th day of April, 2012, upon consideration of Defendant SAP
America, Inc.’s (“SAP”) Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement (Docket No. 93),
Plaintiff CSB-System International, Inc.’s (“CSB”) Response in Opposition and Cross-Motion
for Summary Judgment of Infringement (Docket No. 107), Defendant’s Reply Brief (Docket No.
119), and Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (Docket No. 125), it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1.
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement is GRANTED
on Plaintiff’s theory of literal infringement, but DENIED as to Plaintiff’s theory
of infringement under the doctrine of equivalents;
2.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement is DENIED in its
entirety.
It is so ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Ronald L. Buckwalter
RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S.J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?