GRANT v. WINIK et al

Filing 118

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NOS. 99, 101) ARE GRANTED AS TO COUNTS I TO IV; DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLIES ARE GRANTED (ECF NOS. 110, 113); AND HAVING DISMISSED ALL FEDERAL CLAIMS, THE COURT WILL DECLIN E TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF'S REMAINING STATE-LAW CLAIMS, IN COUNTS V TO VII. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THE CASE AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 6/11/13. 6/11/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
TRACY GRANT,

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Plaintiff,
v.
TIFFANY WINIK, et al.,
Defendants.

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 10-2204

O R D E R
AND NOW, this 11th day of June, 2013, for the reasons
set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby
ORDERED as follows:
1.

Defendants motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 99,
101) are GRANTED as to Counts I to IV;

2.

Defendants’ motions for leave to file replies are
GRANTED (ECF Nos. 110, 113); and

3.

Having dismissed all federal claims, the Court will
decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over
Plaintiff’s remaining state-law claims, in Counts V to
VII.
It is further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall

mark the case as CLOSED.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Eduardo C. Robreno
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO,
J.