SZYMANSKI v. SACCHETTA et al

Filing 33

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT FROM PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT TREATED BY THIS COURT AS A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 1/25/12. 1/26/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA _____________________________________ : : : : : : : : : : : GEORGE R. SZYMANSKI, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS SACCHETTA, GERALD BALDINO, JR., and SACCHETTA AND BALDINO, Defendants. _____________________________________ CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10-cv-02336-JD ORDER AND NOW, this 25th day of January, 2012, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Claim for Breach of Contract from Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 24, filed October 14, 2011), treated by this Court as a Motion for Summary Judgment, and Plaintiff’s Brief in Opposition to the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 29, filed October 31, 2011), for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum dated January 25, 2012, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Claim for Breach of Contract from Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint, treated by this Court as a Motion for Summary Judgment, is DENIED. BY THE COURT: ___/s/ Jan E. DuBois___ JAN E. DUBOIS, J. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?