SZYMANSKI v. SACCHETTA et al
Filing
33
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT FROM PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT TREATED BY THIS COURT AS A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 1/25/12. 1/26/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
_____________________________________
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
GEORGE R. SZYMANSKI,
Plaintiff,
v.
THOMAS SACCHETTA, GERALD
BALDINO, JR., and SACCHETTA AND
BALDINO,
Defendants.
_____________________________________
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 2:10-cv-02336-JD
ORDER
AND NOW, this 25th day of January, 2012, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion
to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Claim for Breach of Contract from Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Doc.
No. 24, filed October 14, 2011), treated by this Court as a Motion for Summary Judgment, and
Plaintiff’s Brief in Opposition to the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 29,
filed October 31, 2011), for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum dated January 25, 2012, IT
IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Claim for Breach of Contract
from Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint, treated by this Court as a Motion for Summary Judgment,
is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
___/s/ Jan E. DuBois___
JAN E. DUBOIS, J.
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?