ADORNO v. ASTRUE
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. ADORNO'S MOTION IS GRANTED INSOFAR AS HE REQUESTS A REMAND. THIS MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 8/19/2011. 8/19/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ems)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Commissioner of Social Security
AND NOW, this 19th day of August, 2011, upon consideration of Plaintiff Alexander
Adorno’s Motion in Support of Request for Review, Defendant’s response thereto, and Adorno’s
reply, and after careful review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
L. Felipe Restrepo, to which no objections have been filed,1 it is ORDERED:
The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
Adorno’s Motion is GRANTED insofar as he requests a remand;
This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42
U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the Report and
The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Juan R. Sánchez
Juan R. Sánchez, J.
The Report and Recommendation was sent to all parties of record on July 29, 2011. Pursuant to
Local Civil Rule 72.1 IV(b), a party may object to a magistrate judge’s report “within fourteen (14)
days after being served with a copy thereof.” As of today’s date, no objections have been filed.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?