WALKER v. MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC

Filing 19

ORDER THAT DEFT'S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION (DOC #12) IS GRANTED. COUNT IV OF PLFF'S COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. THE PARTIES ARE DIRECTED TO ARBITRATE PLFF'S CLAIMS BEFORE THE FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY IN ACCORDANC E WITH THE PARTIES' ARBITRATION AGREEMENT. THE ABOVE ACTION IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE STATISTICALLY. ( SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 4/27/11. ) 4/28/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(gn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STEPHEN TODD WALKER, Plaintiff, v. MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC, Defendant. : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 10-02378 ORDER AND NOW, this 27th day of April, 2011, upon consideration of Defendant Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC’s Motion to Compel Arbitration (ECF No. 12), and all documents submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Count IV of Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED as moot. 2. Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration (ECF No. 12) is GRANTED. 3. The parties are directed to arbitrate Plaintiff’s claims before the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority in accordance with the parties’ arbitration agreement. 4. The above-captioned action is DISMISSED without prejudice and the Clerk of Court shall close this case statistically. BY THE COURT: s/J. Curtis Joyner J. CURTIS JOYNER, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?