VALEZ v. ASTRUE
ORDER THAT REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DATED 2/3/11 IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. MATTER SHALL BE REMANDED FOR AN OPINION BY A MEDICAL EXPERT, ETC. CASE SHALL BE MARKED AS REMANDED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 3/31/11. 4/4/11 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )
VALEZ v. ASTRUE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : : : :
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-2681
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
ORDER AND NOW, this ___ of March, 2011, upon consideration of the parties' submissions in regards to Plaintiff's Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review (Doc. 10), and after careful review of the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Jacob P. Hart (Doc. 16), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED as follows:
The Report and Recommendation dated February 3, 2011, is hereby APPROVED and ADOPTED;
The Plaintiff's Request for Review is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; and
The matter shall be remanded for an opinion by a medical expert as to whether J.M.A.'s limitations rise to the level of "marked" with respect to the domains of interacting and relating with others, and self care.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall mark the above-captioned case as REMANDED.
BY THE COURT: /s/ Petrese B. Tucker ____________________________ Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?