WASHINGTON v. BEARD et al
Filing
60
ORDER THAT THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS 51 IS DENIED. THE MOTION FOR ENFORCEMENT 57 IS DENIED. PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL IS DENIED, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 07/06/2017. 07/06/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF AND E-MAILED.(nds)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JAMES WASHINGTON,
Petitioner,
v.
JEFFREY BEARD, et al.,
Respondents.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 10-2869
O R D E R
AND NOW, this 6th day of July, 2017, upon
consideration of (1) the Court’s September 23, 2016, order (ECF
No. 49), (2) Petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Mandamus (ECF
No. 51), (3) Petitioner’s letter requesting the appointment of
counsel, and (4) Petitioner’s Motion for Enforcement of the
Judgment by Decision of the Courts and Request for Disciplinary
and Other Proceedings Against the State for Continuous
Violations of Ministerial Duties (ECF No. 57), and for the
reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby
ORDERED that:
1.
The Petition for a Writ of Mandamus (ECF No. 51)
is DENIED.
2.
The Motion for Enforcement of the Judgment by
Decision of the Courts and Request for Disciplinary and Other
Proceedings Against the State for Continuous Violations of
Ministerial Duties (ECF No. 57) is DENIED.
3.
Petitioner’s request for the appointment of
counsel is DENIED.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Eduardo C. Robreno
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?