WASHINGTON v. BEARD et al

Filing 60

ORDER THAT THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS 51 IS DENIED. THE MOTION FOR ENFORCEMENT 57 IS DENIED. PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL IS DENIED, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 07/06/2017. 07/06/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF AND E-MAILED.(nds)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JAMES WASHINGTON, Petitioner, v. JEFFREY BEARD, et al., Respondents. : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-2869 O R D E R AND NOW, this 6th day of July, 2017, upon consideration of (1) the Court’s September 23, 2016, order (ECF No. 49), (2) Petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Mandamus (ECF No. 51), (3) Petitioner’s letter requesting the appointment of counsel, and (4) Petitioner’s Motion for Enforcement of the Judgment by Decision of the Courts and Request for Disciplinary and Other Proceedings Against the State for Continuous Violations of Ministerial Duties (ECF No. 57), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Petition for a Writ of Mandamus (ECF No. 51) is DENIED. 2. The Motion for Enforcement of the Judgment by Decision of the Courts and Request for Disciplinary and Other Proceedings Against the State for Continuous Violations of Ministerial Duties (ECF No. 57) is DENIED. 3. Petitioner’s request for the appointment of counsel is DENIED. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Eduardo C. Robreno EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?