SIMPSON v. ASTRUE
Filing
12
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED INSOFAR AS PLAINTIFF REQUESTS THAT THE MATTER BE VACATED AND REMANDED, AND DENIED INSOFAR AS PLAINTIFF REQUESTS REVERSAL OF HTE COMMISSIONER'S DECISION; THE MATTER IS REMANDED; THIS CASE SHALL BE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 4/22/11. 4/22/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
____________________________________
:
EREINA COVINGTON,
:
Plaintiff,
:
CIVIL ACTION
:
v.
:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
:
Commissioner of Social Security,
:
Defendant.
:
____________________________________:
No. 10-2245
ORDER
AND NOW, on this 22 day of April, 2011, upon careful consideration of Plaintiff Ereina
Covington’s Complaint (ECF No. 3) and Brief and Statement of the Issues in Support of Request
for Review (ECF No. 10), it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1.
Plaintiff’s Request for Review is GRANTED insofar as Plaintiff requests that the
matter be vacated and remanded, and DENIED insofar as Plaintiff requests
reversal of the Commissioner’s decision and an award of benefits;
2.
The matter is remanded to the Commissioner, pursuant to sentence four of 42
U.S.C. § 405(g), for further proceedings consistent with the discussion set forth in
the accompanying Memorandum on Request for Review; and
3.
This case shall be CLOSED for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
/ Michael M. Baylson
Michael M. Baylson, U.S.D.J.
O:\CIVIL 09-10\10-2245 Covington v. Astrue\Covington v. Astrue, 10-2245 SS Appeal ORDER.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?