SCHATZBERG, D.C. v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY et al

Filing 24

ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOCKET NO. 14) IS DENIED WITH RESPECT TO COUNT I OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE WITH RESPECT TO COUNTS II, III, IV, V, AND VI OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT.SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 7/12/12. 7/12/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PETER SCHATZBERG, D.C., et al.,

:
:
Plaintiffs,
:
:
v.
:
:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE :
INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.,
:
Defendants.
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 10-2900

ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of July, 2012, upon consideration of Defendants State Farm
Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and State Farm Fire & Casualty Company’s Motion to
Dismiss (Doc. No. 14), and all responses thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is
GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as follows:
1.

The Motion is DENIED with respect to Count I of the Amended Complaint.

2.

The Motion is GRANTED without prejudice with respect to Counts II, III, IV, V,
and VI of the Amended Complaint.

BY THE COURT:

S/Gene E.K. Pratter
GENE E. K. PRATTER
United States District Judge