GRAVES v. SUPERINTENDENT, SCI MAHANOY et al
ORDER AS FOLLOWS: THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED AND DISMISSED WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING; AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF THE COURT SHALL MARK THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE AS CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 10/16/12. 10/17/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(fb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
SUPERINTENDENT, SCI MAHANOY et al,
AND NOW, this ____ day of October, 2012, upon careful and independent consideration of the
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and after review of the Report
and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge M. Faith Angell (Doc. 12), Petitioner’s
Objections thereto (Doc. 13), and Respondents’ Response to Objections (Doc. 15), IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED as follows:
The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED;
The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED AND DISMISSED
WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING; and
There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall mark the above-captioned case
as CLOSED for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Petrese B. Tucker
Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?