MITCHELL v. PITKINS et al

Filing 11

ORDER AS FOLLOWS: THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF THE COURT SHALL MARK THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE AS CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 12/1/10. 12/1/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(fb)

MITCHELL v. PITKINS et al

Doc. 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : :

RONALD JOHN MITCHELL, Petitioner, v. PITKINS ET AL., Respondents.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-3532

O RDE R AND NOW, this ____ of December, 2010, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jacob P. Hart (Doc. 9), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and DECREED as follows: 1. 2. 3. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; The petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED with prejudice; and There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall mark the above-captioned case as CLOSED for statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT: /s/ Petrese B. Tucker ____________________________ Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J.

Dockets.Justia.com