MITCHELL v. PITKINS et al

Filing 11

ORDER AS FOLLOWS: THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF THE COURT SHALL MARK THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE AS CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 12/1/10. 12/1/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(fb)

Download PDF
MITCHELL v. PITKINS et al Doc. 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : : RONALD JOHN MITCHELL, Petitioner, v. PITKINS ET AL., Respondents. CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-3532 O RDE R AND NOW, this ____ of December, 2010, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jacob P. Hart (Doc. 9), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and DECREED as follows: 1. 2. 3. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; The petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED with prejudice; and There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall mark the above-captioned case as CLOSED for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT: /s/ Petrese B. Tucker ____________________________ Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J. Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?