MIRARCHI v. SENECA SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET NO. 31) IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET NO. 33) IS DENIED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR ALL PURPOSES, INCLUDING STATISTICS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 3/22/13. 3/22/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
AND NOW, this 22nd day of March, 2013, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion
for Summary Judgment (Docket Nos. 31, 32), Plaintiff’s Opposition and Cross Motion for
Summary Judgment (Docket Nos. 33, 34), and the supplements and replies thereto (Docket Nos.
36, 46, 49, 50, 61, 62, 63, 67, 70), and following oral argument on April 12, 2012 and July 23,
2012, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion (Docket No. 31) is GRANTED, and
Plaintiff’s Motion (Docket No. 33) is DENIED. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant. The
Clerk of Court shall mark this case as CLOSED for all purposes, including statistics.
BY THE COURT:
S/Gene E.K. Pratter
GENE E.K. PRATTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?