MIRARCHI v. SENECA SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Filing 78

ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET NO. 31) IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET NO. 33) IS DENIED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR ALL PURPOSES, INCLUDING STATISTICS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 3/22/13. 3/22/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ERCOLE MIRARCHI,
Plaintiff,
v.
SENECA SPECIALTY
INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

No. 10-3617

ORDER
AND NOW, this 22nd day of March, 2013, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion
for Summary Judgment (Docket Nos. 31, 32), Plaintiff’s Opposition and Cross Motion for
Summary Judgment (Docket Nos. 33, 34), and the supplements and replies thereto (Docket Nos.
36, 46, 49, 50, 61, 62, 63, 67, 70), and following oral argument on April 12, 2012 and July 23,
2012, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion (Docket No. 31) is GRANTED, and
Plaintiff’s Motion (Docket No. 33) is DENIED. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant. The
Clerk of Court shall mark this case as CLOSED for all purposes, including statistics.

BY THE COURT:

S/Gene E.K. Pratter
GENE E.K. PRATTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE