UNDERLAND v. ALTER et al

Filing 139

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT KPMG'S MOTION TO RECONSIDER IS DENIED. KPMG'S ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO CERTIFY ORDER UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) IS DENIED. THE REPLY FILED ON THIS DATE (DOC. 137) IS STRICKEN AS UNTIMELY AND WITHOUT PERMISSION.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 9/18/12. 9/18/12 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ____________________________________ : : : : : : : : DENNIS ALTER, WILLIAM ROSOFF, : PHILIP BROWNE, DAVID : WEINSTOCK, ROBERT BLANK, : MAX BOTEL, THOMAS COSTELLO, : DANA BECKER DUNN, RONALD : LUBNER, OLAF OLAFSSON, : MICHAEL STOPLER, and KPMG LLP, : Defendants. : ____________________________________: WILLIAM E. UNDERLAND and MARK SCHALLER, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-3621 ORDER AND NOW, this 18th day of September 2012, upon review of the KPMG’s Motion to Reconsider [Doc. No. 115], and Plaintiff’s response thereto, and for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is hereby ORDERED that KPMG’s Motion to Reconsider is DENIED. KPMG’s Alternative Motion to Certify Order Under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) is also denied. The Reply filed on this date [Doc. No. 137] is stricken as untimely and without permission. It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Cynthia M. Rufe HON. CYNTHIA M. RUFE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?