UNDERLAND v. ALTER et al
Filing
139
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT KPMG'S MOTION TO RECONSIDER IS DENIED. KPMG'S ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO CERTIFY ORDER UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) IS DENIED. THE REPLY FILED ON THIS DATE (DOC. 137) IS STRICKEN AS UNTIMELY AND WITHOUT PERMISSION.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 9/18/12. 9/18/12 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
____________________________________
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
DENNIS ALTER, WILLIAM ROSOFF, :
PHILIP BROWNE, DAVID
:
WEINSTOCK, ROBERT BLANK,
:
MAX BOTEL, THOMAS COSTELLO, :
DANA BECKER DUNN, RONALD
:
LUBNER, OLAF OLAFSSON,
:
MICHAEL STOPLER, and KPMG LLP, :
Defendants.
:
____________________________________:
WILLIAM E. UNDERLAND and
MARK SCHALLER, on behalf of
themselves and all others similarly
situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 10-3621
ORDER
AND NOW, this 18th day of September 2012, upon review of the KPMG’s Motion to
Reconsider [Doc. No. 115], and Plaintiff’s response thereto, and for the reasons set forth in the
Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is hereby ORDERED that KPMG’s Motion to
Reconsider is DENIED. KPMG’s Alternative Motion to Certify Order Under 28 U.S.C. §
1292(b) is also denied.
The Reply filed on this date [Doc. No. 137] is stricken as untimely and without
permission.
It is so ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Cynthia M. Rufe
HON. CYNTHIA M. RUFE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?