TIEU v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA et al

Filing 15

ORDER THAT DEFTS MOTION (DOC #12) TO DISMISS PLFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IS GRANTED, AND PLFF'S SECOND MANED COMLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK SHALL MARK THE CASE IS CLOSED. ( SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 12/21/10. ) 12/21/10 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(gn, )

Download PDF
TIEU v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA et al Doc. 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA _____________________________________ THEY TIEU, Plaintiff, v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA and ARLENE ACKERMAN, Defendants. _____________________________________ ORDER AND NOW, this 21st day of December, 2010, upon consideration of Motion of Defendants School District of Philadelphia and Arlene Ackerman to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (Document No. 12, filed November 23, 2010) and Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Document No. 13, filed December 16, 2010), for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum dated December 21, 2010, IT IS ORDERED that Motion of Defendants School District of Philadelphia and Arlene Ackerman to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (Document No. 12, filed November 23, 2010) is GRANTED, and plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall MARK the case CLOSED. : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 10 - 3688 BY THE COURT: /s/ Hon. Jan E. DuBois JAN E. DUBOIS, J. Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?