BROWN & BROWN, INC. et al v. COLA et al

Filing 94

ORDER THAT DEFT RYAN TOLA'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED; AND DEFT ROBERT COLA'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 3/23/2011. 3/24/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(md)

BROWN & BROWN, INC. et al v. COLA et al

Doc. 94

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA BROWN & BROWN, INC., BROWN & BROWN OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC. and GRINSPEC, INC. Plaintiffs, v. ROBERT COLA, RYAN TOLA, and : DOYLE ALLIANCE GROUP, Defendants. : : : : : CIVIL ACTION : : : : NO. 10-3898 : : :

ORDER AND NOW, this 23rd day of March, 2011, upon consideration of (1) Defendant Ryan Tola's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 60), the Response of Plaintiffs Brown & Brown, Inc., Brown & Brown of Pennsylvania, Inc., and Grinspec, Inc. (collectively "Plaintiffs") (Docket No. 75), Defendant Tola's Reply Brief (Docket No. 83), and Plaintiffs' Sur-reply Brief (Docket No. 91); and (2) Defendant Robert Cola's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 79) and Plaintiffs' Response (Docket No. 88), it is hereby ORDERED that the Motions are DENIED as follows: 1. Defendant Tola's request to dismiss the Lanham Act, and Defendant Cola's joinder in that request, are DENIED; The remainder of both Defendant Tola's Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendant Cola's Motion for Summary Judgment are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to re-filing upon the close of discovery.

2.

It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT:

s/ Ronald L. Buckwalter RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S.J.

Dockets.Justia.com