MCKENNA v. HEALTHEASE, INC. et al
Filing
67
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT HEALTHEASE AND TECCO'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 60 IS GRANTED. LOCKHEED MARTIN'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 61 IS GRANTED. LOCKHEED MARTIN'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF 65 IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF ALL DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF ON ALL COUNTS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 4/18/13. 4/19/13 ENTERED & E-MAILED. COPY MAILED TO MAMON. (fdc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LISA MCKENNA,
Plaintiff,
v.
HEALTHEASE, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
No. 10-3940
ORDER
AND NOW, this 18th day of April, 2013, upon consideration of Defendants’ Healthease
and Armand Tecco’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Lockheed Martin’s Motion for Summary
Judgment, Plaintiff’s Omnibus Response and Declaration Requesting Discovery, Lockheed
Martin’s Motion for Leave to File a Reply Brief, and for the reasons provided in this Court’s
Memorandum dated April 18, 2013, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.
Healthease and Tecco’s motion for summary judgment (Document No. 60) is
GRANTED.
2.
Lockheed Martin’s motion for summary judgment (Document No. 61) is
GRANTED.
3.
Lockheed Martin’s motion for leave to file reply brief (Document No. 65) is
GRANTED.
4.
Judgment in entered in favor of all Defendants and against Plaintiff on all counts.
5.
The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
BY THE COURT:
Berle M. Schiller, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?