SHERIDAN v. CURLEY et al
ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ARE OVERRULED; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED AND DISMISSED WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING AND THERE IS NO BASIS WHICH TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 3/16/15. 3/17/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED AND FAXED FROM CHAMBERS. (jpd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MICHAEL CURLEY, ET AL.
AND NOW, this
, 2015, upon consideration of the Report and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge M. Faith Angell (ECF No. 19) and Petitioner’s
Objections thereto (Doc. No. 24), it is ORDERED as follows:
Petitioner’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED;
The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (ECF No. 1),
is DENIED and DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing; and
There is no basis upon which to issue a Certificate of Appealability.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
R. BARCLAY SURRICK, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?