CLARK v. KRAFT FOODS, INC.
Filing
93
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION WHICH SEEKS RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT'S ORDER DATED 10/28/2011 IS DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 5/21/2013. 5/22/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ems)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DONALD C. CLARK,
Plaintiff,
vs.
KRAFT FOODS, INC.,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 10-4063
ORDER
AND NOW, this 21st day of May, 2013, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for
Reconsideration of the Court’s Order Dated October 28, 2011 Denying Kraft’s Motion for
Summary Judgment (Document No. 86, filed January 31, 2013), and Plaintiff’s Answer to
Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s Order Dated October 28, 2011 Denying
Kraft’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Document 91, filed March 11, 2013), for the reasons
stated in the Memorandum dated May 21, 2013, IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
1.
That part of defendant’s Motion which seeks reconsideration of the Court’s Order
dated October 28, 2011 is DENIED.
2.
That part of defendant’s Motion which seeks to strike the Declaration of Vern
Quarles is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to defendant’s right to raise the issue at a later
date if warranted by the facts.
3.
That part of defendant’s Motion which seeks to strike the declarations of Allen
Harris and Richard Gardenhire is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to defendant’s right to
raise the issue at a later date if warranted by the facts.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Hon. Jan E. DuBois
______________
DuBOIS, JAN E., J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?