CLARK v. KRAFT FOODS, INC.

Filing 93

MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION WHICH SEEKS RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT'S ORDER DATED 10/28/2011 IS DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 5/21/2013. 5/22/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ems)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DONALD C. CLARK, Plaintiff, vs. KRAFT FOODS, INC., Defendant. : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-4063 ORDER AND NOW, this 21st day of May, 2013, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s Order Dated October 28, 2011 Denying Kraft’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 86, filed January 31, 2013), and Plaintiff’s Answer to Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s Order Dated October 28, 2011 Denying Kraft’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Document 91, filed March 11, 2013), for the reasons stated in the Memorandum dated May 21, 2013, IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. That part of defendant’s Motion which seeks reconsideration of the Court’s Order dated October 28, 2011 is DENIED. 2. That part of defendant’s Motion which seeks to strike the Declaration of Vern Quarles is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to defendant’s right to raise the issue at a later date if warranted by the facts. 3. That part of defendant’s Motion which seeks to strike the declarations of Allen Harris and Richard Gardenhire is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to defendant’s right to raise the issue at a later date if warranted by the facts. BY THE COURT: /s/ Hon. Jan E. DuBois ______________ DuBOIS, JAN E., J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?