CROWE, III v. WORDSWORTH ACADEMY et al

Filing 51

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS DENIED FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS, PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO RECOVER, AND PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL IS DENIED, AS THE COURT NO LONGER HAS JURISDICTION IN THIS CASE. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE A. SITARSKI ON 3/9/12. 3/9/12 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(fdc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LORENZO CROWE, III Plaintiff, v. WORDSWORTH ACADEMY and DESIREE YOUNG, Defendants. : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No.: 10-cv-4280 ORDER AND NOW, this 9th day of March, 2012, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. No. 46), and the Court having conducted a hearing on February 29, 2012, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is DENIED for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions (Doc. No. 41), Plaintiff’s Motion to Recover (Doc. No. 42), and Plaintiff’s Motion to Withdraw as Counsel (Doc. No. 45) is DENIED, as the Court no longer has jurisdiction in this case. All parties shall bear their own costs associated with these motions. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lynne A. Sitarski LYNNE A. SITARSKI UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?