GREENE v. STREET et al

Filing 72

ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS JOHN F. STREET, DEBRA L. BRADY, PATRICK J. EIDING, AND NELLIE W. REYNOLDS'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM FOR DEPRIVATION OF LIBERTY INTEREST IN REPUTATION WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW IS GRANTED AND JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS JOHN F. STREET, DEBRA L. BRADY, PATRICK J. EIDING, AND NELLIE W. REYNOLDS; AND DEFENDANT PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF'S BRIEF OF CONTRACT CLAIM IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 8/29/2012. 8/31/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CARL R. GREENE, Plaintiff, v. JOHN F. STREET, Chairman DEBRA L. BRADY, PATRICK J. EIDING, NELLIE W. REYNOLDS, and PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-4529 ORDER AND NOW, this 29th day of August, 2012, upon consideration of Defendants John F. Street, Debra L. Brady, Patrick J. Eiding, Nellie W. Reynolds, and Philadelphia Housing Authority’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 63), Plaintiff Carl R. Greene’s Response in Opposition (Docket No. 65), Defendants’ Reply Brief (Docket No. 68), and Plaintiff’s Sur-Reply (Docket No. 69), it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants John F. Street, Debra L. Brady, Patrick J. Eiding, and Nellie W. Reynolds’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff’s claim for deprivation of liberty interest in reputation without due process of law (Count I) is GRANTED and JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of Defendants John F. Street, Debra L. Brady, Patrick J. Eiding, and Nellie W. Reynolds; and 2. Defendant Philadelphia Housing Authority’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff’s breach of contract claim (Count II) is DENIED. BY THE COURT: s/ Ronald L. Buckwalter RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?