NESMITH v. ASTRUE

Filing 15

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. NO. 14 ) IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE COMMISSIONER'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR REMAND (DOC. NO. 13 ) IS GRANTED; PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 8 IS DISMISSED AS MOOT AND THIS MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER PURSUANT TO THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g) FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THIS ADJUDICATION. THE COURT ENTERS FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 58 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 2/28/11. 3/1/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, )

Download PDF
NESMITH v. ASTRUE Doc. 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : : : : : TIMOTHY NESMITH, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. CIVIL ACTION No. 10-4685 ORDER AND NOW, this 28th day of February 2011, upon careful and independent consideration, the record reveals the Commissioner did not apply correct legal standards and that the record does not contain substantial evidence to support the ALJ's findings of fact and conclusions of law. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. 2. 3. The Report and Recommendation [doc. no. 14] is APPROVED and ADOPTED; The Commissioner's Unopposed Motion for Remand [doc. no. 13] is GRANTED; Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [doc. no. 8] is DISMISSED AS MOOT; and 4. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with this adjudication. The Court enters final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case. It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Cynthia M. Rufe CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J. Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?