BANKS v. COLOPLAST CORP.
ORDER THAT THE MOTION (DOC #10) IS GRANTED AS TO PLFF'S NEGLIGENCE AND NEGLIGENCE PER SE CLAIMS, AND DENIED AS TO PLFF'S STRICK LIABILITY CLAIMS. ( SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 2/27/12. ) 2/29/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(gn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
AND NOW, this 27th day of February, 2012, upon review of Defendant’s Motion for
Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 10] and all responses and replies thereto, and for the reasons set
forth in the attached memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is
GRANTED as to Plaintiff’s negligence and negligence per se claims, and DENIED as to
Plaintiff’s strict liability claims.
It is so ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Cynthia M. Rufe
CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?