GROOMS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al

Filing 26

ORDER THAT DEFT BRITTON BROWN'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC #21) IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLFF'S VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ALL CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THAT THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA IS DISMISSED AS A PARTY TO THIS ACTION. ( SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 9/28/12. ) 9/28/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(gn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RAFIA GROOMS,
Plaintiff
v.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al.,
Defendants

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 10-5178

ORDER

AND NOW, this

28th

day of September, 2012, upon consideration of Defendant

Britton Brown’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 21), and Plaintiff’s Response thereto
(Doc. No. 23), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s voluntary
dismissal of all claims against the City of Philadelphia, that the City of Philadelphia is
DISMISSED as a party to this action.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.