LASERLOCK TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. WS PACKAGING GROUP, INC.

Filing 26

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED IN PART AND GRANTED IN PART. DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS UNJUST ENRICHMENT AND UNFAIR COMPEITION CLAIMS IS GRANTED AND THE CLAIMS SHALL BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS PATENT INFRINGEMENT CLAIM IS DENIED. DEFENDANTS MOTION TO TRANSFER THE MATTER IS GRANTED. THIS CASE SHALL BE TRANSFERRED TO THE U.S.D.C. FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AND THE CLERK OF COURT IS ORDERED TO MAKE THE TRANSFER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. WILLIAM DITTER, JR ON 8/18/2011. 8/22/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRlCT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRlCT OF PENNSYLVANIA LaserLock TECHNOLOGIES, INC. CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 10-5439 WS PACKAGING GROUP> INC. ORDER AND NOW, this r1" 10./ day of August, 2011, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's motion to dismiss is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part, as follows: 1. Defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiffs unjust enriclunent and unfair competition claims is GRANTED and the claims shall be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 2. Defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiffs patent infringement claim is DENIED. 3. Defendant' motion to transfer the matter is GRANTED. This case shall be transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania and the Clerk of Court is ORDERED to make the transfer. BY THE COURT:

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?