PERELMAN v. PERELMAN et al

Filing 160

ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 140 ), IS GRANTED. THE MOTION IN LIMINE (DOC. NO. 142 ), IS DENIED AS MOOT. THE MOTION TO SEAL DOCUMENT (DOC. NO. 151 ), IS DENIED. THE MOTION TO FILE SUPPLEMENTED SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 156 ), IS DENIED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY, JASON GUZEK, RAYMOND G. PERELMAN, AND RELIANCE TRUST COMPANY AND AGAINST JEFFREY E. PERELMAN. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 2/18/2014. 2/18/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO COUNSEL AND E-MAILED.(amas)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JEFFREY E. PERELMAN
v.
RAYMOND G. PERELMAN,
JASON GUZEK, and GENERAL
REFRACTORIES COMPANY

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 10-5622

ORDER
AND NOW, this 18th day of February, 2014, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
1.

The Motion of General Refractories Company, Jason Guzek, Raymond G.

Perelman, and Reliance Trust Company for summary judgment (Docket No. 140) is
GRANTED.
2.

The Motion in Limine of General Refractories Company, Jason Guzek, Raymond

G. Perelman, and Reliance Trust Company (Docket No. 142) is DENIED AS MOOT.
3.

The Motion of General Refractories Company, Jason Guzek, Raymond G.

Perelman, and Reliance Trust Company to Seal Document (Docket No. 151) is DENIED.
4.

The Motion of Jeffrey E. Perelman to File Supplemented Second Amended

Complaint (Docket No. 156) is DENIED.
5.

JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of General Refractories Company, Jason

Guzek, Raymond G. Perelman, and Reliance Trust Company and against Jeffrey E. Perelman.
6.

The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ John R. Padova
__________________________________
John R. Padova, J.