MCCARTY v. MARPLE TOWNSHIP AMBULANCE CORPS

Filing 24

ORDER of MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION (DOC. #23) that DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 14) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS:. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED AS TO PLAINTIFF'S COUNT II TITLE VII CLAIM, COUNT III SS 1981 CLAIM, AND COUNT IV PHRA RACIAL DISCRIMINATION CLAIM.. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMARY JDUGMENT IS DENIED AS TO PLAINTIFF'S COUNT I ADA CLAIM AND COUNT IV PHRA DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION CLAIM.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 6/5/2012. 6/5/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES VIA ECF AND U.S. MAIL.(mo, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MICHAEL MCCARTY, Plaintiff v. MARPLE TOWNSHIP AMBULANCE CORPS, Defendant : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-5747 ORDER AND NOW, this _5th __ day of June 2012, it is ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 14) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: ! Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiff’s Count II Title VII Claim, Count III § 1981 claim, and Count IV PHRA racial discrimination claim. ! Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgement is DENIED as to Plaintiff’s Count I ADA Claim and Count IV PHRA disability discrimination claim. s/Anita B. Brody __________________________ ANITA B. BRODY, J. Copies VIA ECF on _________ to: Copies MAILED on _______ to:

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?