BRYANT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al

Filing 20

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 16) IS GRANTED AS TO PLAINTIFFS CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT CITY OF PHILADELPHIA AND PLAINTIFFS CLAIMS TO THE EXTENT THEY ARE BROUGHT UNDER THE FIRST, SIXTH, EIGHTH AND FOURTEENTH AM ENDMENTS. DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRNATED TO PLAINTIFFS CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS HOOVER, COONEY, CASSIDY, AMARO, SCOTT, LEWIS, SGT MCDONALD, DIBIASIO AND WILLIAM MCDONALD.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 1/27/12. 1/30/12 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(rf, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
HAKIM ALI BRYANT,
Plaintiff,

:
:
:
:
:
v.
:
:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al., :
Defendants.
:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 10-6111

ORDER
AND NOW, this 27th day of January, 2012, it is hereby
ORDERED that:

1. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 16) is
GRANTED as to Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant City of
Philadelphia and Plaintiff’s claims to the extent they are
brought under the First, Sixth, Eighth and Fourteenth
Amendments.

2. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to
Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Hoover, Cooney,

1

Cassidy, Amaro, Scott, Lewis, Sgt. McDonald, DiBiasio and
William McDonald.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Eduardo C. Robreno
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.

2