ARTHUR L. HUDSON, et al v. SUN NATIONAL BANK et al

Filing 135

ORDERED THAT SUN NATIONAL BANK'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET NO. 121) IS GRANTED AND JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AS OUTLINED IN THE ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 7/25/14. 7/25/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(rab, ) .

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ARTHUR L. HUDSON et al. v. SUN NATIONAL BANK et al. : : : : : CIVIL ACTION 1 No. 10-6401 No. 10-5481 No. 11-0432 ORDER of JUDGMENT AND NOW, this 25th day of July, 2014, upon consideration of Sun National Bank’s (“Sun”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 121), Mr. Hudson’s, Mrs. Hudson’s, and Mrs. Zysk’s (“the Individual Defendants”) various Responses in Opposition (Docket Nos. 122, 123, & 124), Sun’s Reply (Docket No. 127), oral argument held on July 8, 2014, and the subsequent correspondence from the parties (Docket Nos. 129, 131, 132, & 133), the Court hereby ORDERS that— 1. Sun’s Motion is GRANTED. 2. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of Sun National Bank and a. against Arthur Hudson, in the amount of $2,151,223.28; b. against Theresa Hudson, in the amount of $2,151,223.28 or the value of her spousal interest in the collateral pledged, i.e., the marital home, whichever is less; c. against Lorraine Zysk, in the amount of $2,151,223.28 or the value of her spousal interest in the collateral pledged, i.e., the marital home, whichever is less. 1 The actions under these three docket numbers were consolidated. This Order of Judgment should be filed on all three dockets to provide absolutely clear notice of the final outcome of this litigation. 1 3. The Individual Defendants shall share liability jointly and severally with one another and Rapid Circuits, Inc., against which judgment has already been entered, see May 2, 2014 Order (Docket No. 89), as limited above in paragraph 2. BY THE COURT: S/Gene E.K. Pratter GENE E.K. PRATTER United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?