ARTHUR L. HUDSON, et al v. SUN NATIONAL BANK et al
Filing
135
ORDERED THAT SUN NATIONAL BANK'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET NO. 121) IS GRANTED AND JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AS OUTLINED IN THE ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 7/25/14. 7/25/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(rab, ) .
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ARTHUR L. HUDSON et al.
v.
SUN NATIONAL BANK et al.
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION 1
No. 10-6401
No. 10-5481
No. 11-0432
ORDER of JUDGMENT
AND NOW, this 25th day of July, 2014, upon consideration of Sun National Bank’s
(“Sun”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 121), Mr. Hudson’s, Mrs. Hudson’s, and
Mrs. Zysk’s (“the Individual Defendants”) various Responses in Opposition (Docket Nos. 122,
123, & 124), Sun’s Reply (Docket No. 127), oral argument held on July 8, 2014, and the
subsequent correspondence from the parties (Docket Nos. 129, 131, 132, & 133), the Court
hereby ORDERS that—
1.
Sun’s Motion is GRANTED.
2.
JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of Sun National Bank and
a. against Arthur Hudson, in the amount of $2,151,223.28;
b. against Theresa Hudson, in the amount of $2,151,223.28 or the value of
her spousal interest in the collateral pledged, i.e., the marital home,
whichever is less;
c. against Lorraine Zysk, in the amount of $2,151,223.28 or the value of
her spousal interest in the collateral pledged, i.e., the marital home,
whichever is less.
1
The actions under these three docket numbers were consolidated. This Order of Judgment
should be filed on all three dockets to provide absolutely clear notice of the final outcome of this
litigation.
1
3. The Individual Defendants shall share liability jointly and severally with one
another and Rapid Circuits, Inc., against which judgment has already been
entered, see May 2, 2014 Order (Docket No. 89), as limited above in paragraph
2.
BY THE COURT:
S/Gene E.K. Pratter
GENE E.K. PRATTER
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?