ARTHUR L. HUDSON, et al v. SUN NATIONAL BANK et al

Filing 42

ORDERED THAT MOTIONS TO DISMISS (DOCKET NOS. 24 AND 27) ARE GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THE MOTIONS ARE GRANTED AS TO COUNTS I, II, III, V, VI, VII, VIII, X, AND XI. THE MOTIONS ARE DENIED AS TO COUNTS II, IV AND IX. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 5/2/11. 5/3/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RAPID CIRCUITS, INC., ARTHUR L.
:
HUDSON, THERESA G. HUDSON,
:
FRANCIS E. ZYSK, and LORRAINE G. ZYSK, :
Plaintiffs,
:
v.
:
:
SUN NATIONAL BANK,
:
SUN BANCORP, INC., DEEB, PETRAKIS,
:
BLUM & MURPHY, P.C., and INEZ M.
:
MARKOVICH,
:
Defendants.
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 10-6401

ORDER
AND NOW, this 2nd day of May 2011, having considered the Motion to Dismiss the
Amended Complaint of Defendants Sun National and Sun Bancorp (Doc. No. 24) and the Motion
to Dismiss the Amended Complaint of Defendants Deeb, Petrakis, Blum & Murphy, P.C. and
Inez M. Markovich (Doc. No. 27), and Plaintiffs’ Responses thereto (Doc. Nos. 36 and 38), as
well as the representations of counsel at oral argument on January 28, 2011, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Motions are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as follows:
1. The Motions are GRANTED as to Counts I, II, III, V, VI, VII, VIII, X, and XI;
2. The Motions are DENIED as to Counts II, IV, and IX.1
BY THE COURT:

S/Gene E.K. Pratter
GENE E.K. PRATTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1

As to Count II (Intentional Interference with Existing and Prospective Business and
Contractual Relations) and as discussed in the accompanying Memorandum, the Court grants the
Motions to Dismiss as to any claim for intentional interference with prospective contractual
relations, and denies the Motions to Dismiss as to a claim for intentional interference with
existing contractual relations.