WATSON et al v. HAVERFORD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 10) IS DENIED IN ITS ENTIRETY.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 6/6/11. 6/7/11 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JANET WATSON and WILLIAM
WATSON,
Plaintiffs,
v.
HAVERFORD TOWNSHIP POLICE
DEPARTMENT, THE TOWNSHIP OF
HAVERFORD, CARMEN D. PETTINE,
HARVEY PIKE, STEVEN GILL, and
JOHN PILI,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 10-6731
ORDER
AND NOW, this 6thday of June, 2011, upon consideration of Defendant John Pili’s
Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint (Docket No. 10) and Plaintiffs’ Response in
Opposition (Docket No. 13), it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss
(Docket No. 10) is DENIED in its entirety.
It is so ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Ronald L. Buckwalter
RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S.J.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
