SELECTIVE WAY INSURANCE COMPANY v. HEAD

Filing 13

ORDER THAT MICHAEL J. IANNUZZI'S PETITION TO INTERVENE IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE THE PETITION TO INTERVENE IS DENIED AS MOOT. PLAINTIFFS FIRST MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT THOMAS HEAD T/A HEAD & SON HOME IMPROVE MENT IS GRANTED. FINAL JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT. THE CLERK SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 4/14/2011. 4/15/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREP AND E-MAILED. FAXED BY CHAMBERS.(sg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SELECTIVE WAY INSURANCE COMPANY : : : : : : v. THOMAS HEAD, individually and t/a Head & Son Home Improvement CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-7029 ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO INTERVENE AND FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND NOW, this 14th day of April, 2011, following careful consideration of Michael J. Iannuzzi’s Petition to Intervene (ECF No. 5), Plaintiff Selective Way Insurance Company’s Response to Motion re: Petition to Intervene and Motion to Strike (ECF No. 8), and the Reply thereto (ECF No. 10), and for the reasons in the foregoing Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Michael J. Iannuzzi’s Petition to Intervene (ECF No. 5) is DENIED. 2. Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike the Petition to Intervene (ECF No. 8) is DENIED as moot. In addition, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s First Motion for Default Judgment as to Defendant Thomas Head t/a Head & Son Home Improvement (ECF No. 6), it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 3. Plaintiff’s First Motion for Default Judgment as to Defendant Thomas Head t/a Head & Son Home Improvement (ECF No. 6) is GRANTED. 4. Final Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant. 5. The Clerk shall close this case. 1 BY THE COURT: s/Michael M. Baylson Michael M. Baylson, U.S.D.J. O:\CIVIL 09-10\10-7029 Selective Way v. Head\Petition to intervene - Order.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?