MIKELL v. VARANO

Filing 6

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PETIITON FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED AS TIME-BARRED. A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHOULD NOT ISSUE, ETC; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR ALL PURPOSES, INCLUDING STATISTICS.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 2/28/11. 3/1/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(lvj, )

Download PDF
MIKELL v. VARANO Doc. 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WILLIAM MIKELL, Petitioner, v. DAVID A. VARANO, et al., Respondents. : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-7095 ORDER AND NOW, this 28th day of February, 2011, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254; the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge L. Felipe Restrepo, and Petitioner's Objections thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. 2. 3. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED as time-barred. A certificate of appealability should not issue because Petitioner has failed to show that a reasonable jurist could conclude that the Court is incorrect in dismissing the Petition as time-barred. 4. The Clerk of Court shall close this case for all purposes, including statistics. BY THE COURT: /s/ C. Darnell Jones II ____________________________ C. DARNELL JONES II, U.S.D.J. Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?