PORTER v. T.D. BANK, N.A.
Filing
98
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DOC. #87) IS DENIED IN ITS ENTIRETY. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO VACATE THE ORDER PLACING A SEAL ON THE ORAL ARGUMENT HELD BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED ON 6/18/2012 (DOC. #96) IS GRANTED, THE ORDER OF 6/20/2012, IS VACATED, AND THE SEAL IS LIFTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WILLIAM H. YOHN, JR ON 12/5/2012. 12/6/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED AND XC TO TRANSCRIPTION DEPT.(tomg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DEBRA PORTER,
Plaintiff,
v.
TD BANK, N.A., et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-7243
ORDER
AND NOW, this 5th day of December 2012, upon careful consideration of plaintiff
Debra Porter’s motion for reconsideration of the order dated August 27, 2012, granting summary
judgment in favor of defendants (Document No. 87), which includes a request to file a second
amended complaint and a motion for summary judgment on that proposed filing; defendants’
responses thereto; and plaintiff’s supplemental praecipe; it is hereby ORDERED that the motion
for reconsideration is DENIED in its entirety. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s
motion to vacate the order placing a seal on the oral argument held before the undersigned on
June 18, 2012 (Document No. 96) is GRANTED, the order of June 20, 2012, is VACATED,
and the seal is LIFTED.
/s/ William H. Yohn Jr., Judge
William H. Yohn Jr., Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?