PORTER v. T.D. BANK, N.A.

Filing 98

MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DOC. #87) IS DENIED IN ITS ENTIRETY. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO VACATE THE ORDER PLACING A SEAL ON THE ORAL ARGUMENT HELD BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED ON 6/18/2012 (DOC. #96) IS GRANTED, THE ORDER OF 6/20/2012, IS VACATED, AND THE SEAL IS LIFTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WILLIAM H. YOHN, JR ON 12/5/2012. 12/6/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED AND XC TO TRANSCRIPTION DEPT.(tomg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DEBRA PORTER, Plaintiff, v. TD BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-7243 ORDER AND NOW, this 5th day of December 2012, upon careful consideration of plaintiff Debra Porter’s motion for reconsideration of the order dated August 27, 2012, granting summary judgment in favor of defendants (Document No. 87), which includes a request to file a second amended complaint and a motion for summary judgment on that proposed filing; defendants’ responses thereto; and plaintiff’s supplemental praecipe; it is hereby ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is DENIED in its entirety. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to vacate the order placing a seal on the oral argument held before the undersigned on June 18, 2012 (Document No. 96) is GRANTED, the order of June 20, 2012, is VACATED, and the seal is LIFTED. /s/ William H. Yohn Jr., Judge William H. Yohn Jr., Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?