MAACO FRANCHISING, INC. v. WALID HASSOUN NAAMAN et al
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED AND JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ON COUNT I OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IN PLAINTIFF'S FAVOR AND AGAINST AL L DEFENDANTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $130,120.12. THE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT WAS VALIDLY TERMINATED AS OF 9/30/10. PLANTIFF'S REQUEST FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS, PURSUANT TO THE TERMS OF THE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT, IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF SHALL SU BMIT A PETITION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS ON OR BEFORE 12/13/11. DEFENDANTS SHALL FILE ANY OBJECTIONS THERETO ON OR BEFORE 12/20/11. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 11/29/11. 11/30/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE DEFENDANTS, E-MAILED.(fdc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
:
:
:
v.
:
:
WALID HASSOUN NAAMAN, ROGER D. :
NAAMAN, AND EDGAR THOMAS SMITH :
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC.
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 10-7410
ORDER
AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2011, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for
Summary Judgment (Docket No. 26), and all documents filed in connection therewith, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
1.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File a Reply Brief (Docket No. 29) is GRANTED.
2.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and JUDGMENT IS
ENTERED on Count I of the Amended Complaint in Plaintiff’s favor and against
all Defendants in the amount of $130,120.12.
3.
The Franchise Agreement was validly terminated as of September 30, 2010.
4.
Plaintiff’s request for attorneys’ fees and costs, pursuant to the terms of the Franchise
Agreement, is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall submit a petition for attorneys’ fees and
costs on or before December 13, 2011. Defendants shall file any objections thereto
on or before December 20, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ John R. Padova
John R. Padova, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?