NOVA DESIGN TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. v. WALTERS et al
AMENDED MEMORANDUM. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 6/28/2012. 6/29/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ems)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
NOVA DESIGN TECHNOLOGIES,
MATTHEW K. WALTERS, et al.
June 28, 2012
The Memorandum Opinion of June 27, 2012 in the abovecaptioned matter is amended as follows:
The first paragraph under Section A of page 14 shall
The plaintiff has withdrawn a
number of claims that it had brought against
Dale Walters and Brian Guerra. Nova has
withdrawn Counts II, III, and IV as against
Dale Walters. Pl.’s Opp. 20; Tr. Hr’g 5/9/12
at 84. It has also withdrawn Count IV as
against Guerra. Id. at 88. Finally, the
plaintiff concedes that its correction-ofinventorship claim in Count VI is properly
directed at Matthew Walters, who is the named
inventor in the ‘157 Patent. Id. at 84-85.
The remaining claims against the individual
defendants are thus: (1) Counts II and III,
against Matthew Walters and Brian Guerra;
(2) Count IV, against Matthew Walters;
(3) Count V, against all individual
defendants; and (4) Count VI, against Matthew
The final sentence of Section III.A.1 on page 20 shall
The individual defendants’ motion
will be granted as to Brian Guerra and
Matthew Walters on Counts II, III, and V, and
as to Matthew Walters on Count IV.
An appropriate order shall issue separately.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?